Moralisches Dilemma

Argumente, die der eigenen Meinung widersprechen –, das moralische Denken Die Diskussion moralischer Dilemmas dient der Förderung der moralischen. nicht mit dem. Thema auseinandersetzen, wird am. Moralisches Dilemma. Autonome Systeme erobern unsere Welt und treffen selbstständig Entscheidungen. Moralisches Dilemma. Stellt die Forschung an embryonalen Stammzellen uns vor moralische Dilemmata? Was ist ein Dilemma überhaupt? Dilemma heißt wörtlich.

Moralisches Dilemma Navigationsmenü

Ein moralisches Dilemma liegt dann vor, wenn wir uns in einer Situation zwischen mehreren gleichermassen inakzeptablen oder zumindest. Unter einem ethischen Dilemma versteht man eine ethisch-moralische Entscheidungssituation, in der mehrere Handlungen gleichzeitig geboten sind, sich gegenseitig aber ausschließen. Die Befolgung des einen Gebots führt zum Verstoß gegen das andere. Unter einem ethischen Dilemma versteht man eine ethisch-moralische Entscheidungssituation, in der mehrere Handlungen gleichzeitig geboten sind, sich. Moralisches Dilemma. Stellt die Forschung an embryonalen Stammzellen uns vor moralische Dilemmata? Was ist ein Dilemma überhaupt? Dilemma heißt wörtlich. Das bekannteste ist das bei Digitalisierungsthemen immer wieder aus der Mottenkiste geholte moralische Dilemma des sogenannten «Trolley-. Fast jeder Mensch trifft manchmal unmoralische Entscheidungen (im Job). Aber wieso? Wir erklären Ihnen hier die Psychologie hinter dem Phänomen. Moralische Dilemmata dienen in der Theorie Kohlbergs der Erfassung moralischer Kognitionen, wobei in den jeweils beschriebenen Dilemmasituationen.

Unter einem ethischen Dilemma versteht man eine ethisch-moralische Entscheidungssituation, in der mehrere Handlungen gleichzeitig geboten sind, sich gegenseitig aber ausschließen. Die Befolgung des einen Gebots führt zum Verstoß gegen das andere. Moralisches Dilemma. Stellt die Forschung an embryonalen Stammzellen uns vor moralische Dilemmata? Was ist ein Dilemma überhaupt? Dilemma heißt wörtlich. Ein moralisches Dilemma liegt dann vor, wenn wir uns in einer Situation zwischen mehreren gleichermassen inakzeptablen oder zumindest.

Moralisches Dilemma Antinomie der praktischen Vernunft?

Viele Menschen haben genau mit solchen Entscheidungen ein Problem und nicht umsonst trifft das berühmte Sprichwort. Jahrhundert Für beide Kartenstapel galt, dass die roten Karten Strafzahlungen nach sich zogen. Deutsche Länderausgabe. Ningen nur einen dicken Mann, der am Gleis steht und den Zug rechtzeitig stoppen würde, wenn Sie ihn vor den Zug werfen. NZZ Folio.

Moralisches Dilemma Random collection of thoughts, articles, guides and tips that I want to hang onto. Video

Kohlbergs Theorie zur moralischen Entwicklung Was läge da näher, als sich mit der Frage zu beschäftigen, wie dem Problem effektiv zu Leibe gerückt Kommissar Rex Sat 1 Gold kann? Moral ist abhängig von der Situation 7. Glücklicherweise haben längst nicht alle moralischen Konflikte die Form eines Dilemmas. Auch solche Konflikte können von den Betroffenen als sehr belastend erfahren werden, wenn viel auf dem Spiel steht. Das Antlitz des Anderen.

Moralisches Dilemma Post navigation Video

Kohlbergs Theorie zur moralischen Entwicklung

At first you feel angry that he would do such a thing and start planning your responsibility lecture, but then you realize that you are in Bali, and they have a zero tolerance policy on drugs, meaning your son could be jailed for life, or worse, executed, if he does have some illicit materials in his bag.

You look at your wife and realize she has come to the same conclusion and has gone pale with fear. The armed officer accompanying the dog is beginning to look more stern with every sniff the dog takes and looks directly at you and asks you to open to the bag.

You see your wife in the corner of your eye, and she is about to step forward and claim it as her own. A madman who has threatened to explode several bombs in crowded areas has been apprehended.

Unfortunately, he has already planted the bombs and they are scheduled to go off in a short time. It is possible that hundreds of people may die.

The authorities cannot make him divulge the location of the bombs by conventional methods. He refuses to say anything and requests a lawyer to protect his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination.

In exasperation, some high level official suggests torture. This would be illegal, but the official is sure that it will make him tell the truth in time for you to find and defuse the bombs.

What if you know that the bomber can withstand torture himself, but would talk if you were to torture his innocent wife instead?

You are going on a cruise. As it is lowered however, it hits the side of the ship, putting a hole in the side of the raft, and when it hits the water it begins to sink.

While taking your break, you glance over to another boat and notice that a friend of yours whom you met on the boat is there and has noticed your predicament.

There is only just enough room for one more person. You estimate that if you jump ship, you will force all 9 remaining crew members to bail water continuously, which will reduce the total time they can stay afloat to just 2 hours, but will ensure that you will be able to live long enough to be rescued.

As you watch the boat with your friend drift away, you realize you have about 30 seconds to make a decision. In , a ship struck an iceberg and more than 30 survivors were crowded into a lifeboat intended to hold 7.

As a storm threatened, it became obvious that the lifeboat would have to be lightened if anyone were to survive. The captain reasoned that the right thing to do in this situation was to force some individuals to go over the side and drown.

Such an action, he reasoned, was not unjust to those thrown overboard, for they would have drowned anyway. If he did nothing, however, he would be responsible for the deaths of those whom he could have saved.

They claimed that if nothing were done and everyone died as a result, no one would be responsible for these deaths. On the other hand, if the captain attempted to save some, he could do so only by killing others and their deaths would be his responsibility; this would be worse than doing nothing and letting all die.

The captain rejected this reasoning. Since the only possibility for rescue required great efforts of rowing, the captain decided that the weakest would have to be sacrificed.

In this situation it would be absurd, he thought, to decide by drawing lots who should be thrown overboard. As it turned out, after days of hard rowing, the survivors were rescued and the captain was tried for his action.

Imagine that a powerful alien were to visit earth, with the ability to eradicate war, famine and suffering.

The alien says that he will do this, and turn the world into a utopia where humans will be happy and peaceful forever more, but only if a price is paid.

He demands a small child be given to him so that he can perform hideous scientific experiments on it, causing the child unimaginable pain.

Tom, hating his wife and wanting her dead, puts poison in her coffee, thereby killing her. Jane also hates her husband, and would like him dead.

One day her husband accidentally puts poison in his own coffee, thinking it is cream. Jane realises this, and has the antidote that could save him, but does not hand it over and her husband dies.

You are on a plane containing people, currently flying over barren desert. Hijackers take over, killing the pilot and co-pilot, and sealing themselves in the cockpit.

There is no way for you to open the door, but you could damage the ventilation system causing poisonous fumes to fill the cockpit.

If you do this the hijackers will die, but with no-one able to enter the cockpit and fly the plane, it will crash in the desert killing everyone on board.

If you do nothing, the hijackers might land the plane safely, or they might crash it into a civilian target killing even more people.

You are a skilled doctor, with five patients who all need different organ transplants. You have a sixth patient, who is dying of an incurable disease.

At the moment you are giving him medicine to ease his pain and prolong his life. He is a compatible organ donor for your five other patients, but the medicine he is taking will keep him alive just a day longer than they have left.

If you were to stop giving him medicine he would die before them, in a very painful way, but you would then be able to use his organs to save the other five.

You witness a man rob a bank, but instead of keeping the money for himself, he donates it to a local orphanage. You know this orphanage has been struggling for funding, and this money will allow the children to receive proper food, clothing and medical care.

If you report the crime, the money will be taken away from the orphanage and given back to the bank. You are an English teacher at a high school.

One of your pupils is a very bright and gifted girl, whom you have always enjoyed teaching. She has always achieved A grades throughout her school years, and is now in her final year and getting ready to graduate.

Unfortunately she has been very ill this term, and missed several weeks of schooling. If you report her plagiarisation to the school authorities it will be entered on her permanent record and she will no longer be eligible to attend the prestigious university that she has dreamed of attending all through high school.

If you refuse to accept the report, her final mark will be very poor and may harm her chances of being chosen for this university.

If you mark the paper as though you believed it was her own work, she will do very well, and stand every chance of getting her desired university place.

Your partner is dying from a rare disease. Luckily a cure has recently been invented, by one druggist who lives fairly close to you.

This druggist is selling the cure for ten times the amount it cost him to make it. You try to raise the money, but even borrowing from friends and taking a loan from the bank, you can only raise half the amount.

You go to the druggist and offer to pay him half now and half later, but he refuses, saying that he invented the cure and is determined to make money off it.

You beg him to sell it cheaper as your partner will die before you can raise the full amount, but he still refuses.

You believe you could break into his store one night after he has gone home and steal the cure. This would definitely save your partner, although you might be arrested for the crime.

I also give my audience ethical dilemmas that help people identify their moral compass through my scenarios. You are a city cop patrolling a rough neighborhood at am.

Your longtime partner, McAllen, opens up a brown prescription bottle and you seem wash down three painkillers with his morning coffee.

Lunchtime arrives and McAllen spots a robbery in progress right up the avenue. He takes off in high speed pursuit of the perpetrator and you stay behind as backup.

In response, McAllen fires a round and hits the robber in the gut, disabling him, and you take him into custody.

Later, your sergeant asks you for the exact details of the events leading up to the McAllen shooting, and did anything out of the ordinary happen?

Right-Your partner legally used lethal force against a robber who was doing him harm. In the robin hood robber one I would steal the money from the orphanage they would no doubt call the cop and return the money to the bank.

The manager of an orphaage is not an unscrupulous person and then i would help the kids through subtle donations. Irregardless of there being anything illegal in the pills, you recognize them as painkillers.

Mc Allen took three and that could impair his judgment and physical ability to do his job. Choices of doing what society thinks is right, what you think is right or what the person s in the dilemma think is right.

I would like to comment regarding the alien making the world a perfect one only if the child is sacrificed. My reasoning is this, this child is a completely innocent human being, if you were to choose one child to be sacrificed, what would be a completely fair way to do it?

I would not even want to think about sacrificing innocent people for this selfish, corrupt, wicked and hypocritical world. My answer, therefore is no, I will not choose any innocent child or human being to suffer for it.

The question is whether the privilege covers future events. I would refine my understanding of language particularly homonyms , and perhaps attend a Philosophy course.

In the Overloaded Lifeboat scenario people could just jump off the side of the boat and hang off the side so they could still live but not put all of their body weight on the boat… duh.

Marry has mixed feelings about that situation, because on hand she want to help femily and on the other hand she does not wants to kill the old man.

For the unfaithful wife, I think the man should be saved because then he definitely survives. In this situation I think you just have to save yourself and go for the other boat.

Skip to content Moral dilemmas are thought experiments which ask you to imagine a difficult situation and decide what you think the morally correct course of action would be.

Government Misdirecting Anger. Pingback: week 8 20th November — Analytical and Critical thinking. The start of becoming an educationalist.

Is That Right or Wrong? The manager of an orphaage is not an unscrupulous person and then i would help the kids through subtle donations and to answer Drew Mitty ….

Moral Dilemmas: Choices of doing what society thinks is right, what you think is right or what the person s in the dilemma think is right.

The life insurance Police Marry has mixed feelings about that situation, because on hand she want to help femily and on the other hand she does not wants to kill the old man.

Haselhoef, Author. Pingback: Social Justice emerges from the example of Jesus Christ and calls us to action in our lives.

Catholic Social Teaching. If all famine, war, disease ect. Pingback: Alicja Advanced - Freeway.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. The least that we can say is that that person is just experiencing a problematic or distressful situation.

Thus, the most logical thing to do for that person is to look for alternatives or solutions to address the problem. When dilemmas involve human actions which have moral implications, they are called ethical or moral dilemmas.

Consider the following example:. Lindsay is a deeply religious person; hence, she considers killing humans absolutely wrong.

Unfortunately, it is found out that Lindsay is having an ectopic pregnancy. As is well known, an ectopic pregnancy is a type of pregnancy that occurs outside the uterus, most commonly in the fallopian tubes.

In other words, in ectopic pregnancy, the fetus does not develop in the uterus. Now, if this happens, the development of the fetus will definitely endanger the mother.

Thus, if Lindsay continues with her pregnancy, then there is a big possibility that she will die. If we do not abort the fetus, then Lindsay, as well as the fetus, will die.

In the above example of a moral dilemma, Lindsay is faced with two conflicting options, namely, either she resorts to abortion, which will save her life but at the same time jeopardizes her moral integrity or does not resort to abortion but endangers her life as well as the fetus.

Indeed, Lindsay is faced with a huge moral dilemma. According to Karen Allen, there are three conditions that must be present for situations to be considered moral dilemmas.

First, the person or the agent of a moral action is obliged to make a decision about which course of action is best. Here, the moral agent must choose the best option and act accordingly.

In the case of the example of above, Lindsay may opt to abort the fetus as the best course of action. Second, there must be different courses of action to choose from.

Hence, as already pointed out above, there must be two or more conflicting options to choose from for moral dilemmas to occur. And third, no matter what course of action is taken, some moral principles are always compromised.

This means that, according to Allen, there is no perfect solution to the problem. In other words, by choosing one of the possible moral requirements, the person also fails on others.

There are several types of moral dilemmas, but the most common of them are categorized into the following: 1 epistemic and ontological dilemmas, 2 self-imposed and world-imposed dilemmas, 3 obligation dilemmas and prohibition dilemmas, and 4 single agent and multi-person dilemmas.

Epistemic moral dilemmas involve situations wherein two or more moral requirements conflict with each other and that the moral agent hardly knows which of the conflicting moral requirements takes precedence over the other.

In other words, the moral agent here does not know which option is morally right or wrong. For instance, I ought to honor my promise to my son to be home early, but on my way home I saw a sick old man who needs to be brought to the hospital.

Where does my actual duty lie? We cannot deny that there are conflicting duties moral requirements here, but we need to note that we want a fuller knowledge of the situation: Is an important purpose being served by my getting home early?

How serious is the condition of the sick old man? Indeed, I could hardly decide which option is morally right in this situation.

Ontological moral dilemmas , on the other hand, involve situations wherein two or more moral requirements conflict with each other, yet neither of these conflicting moral requirements overrides each other.

This is not to say that the moral agent does not know which moral requirement is stronger than the other. The point is that neither of the moral requirements is stronger than the other; hence, the moral agent can hardly choose between the conflicting moral requirements.

For instance, a military doctor is attending to the needs of the wounded soldiers in the middle of the war. Unfortunately, two soldiers urgently need a blood transfusion.

However, only one bag of blood is available at the moment. To whom shall the doctor administer the blood transfusion? For sure, we could not tell whether administering a blood transfusion to Soldier A is more moral than administering a blood transfusion to Soldier B, and vice versa.

For example, David is running for the position of the town mayor. During the campaign period, he promised the indigenous peoples in his community to protect their virgin forest just to gain their votes, but at the same time, he seeks financial support from a mining corporation.

In a short time Ironclad Battle For Blood tide will be upon them, and unless she is unstuck, Divas will all be drowned except the woman, whose head is out of the cave. Here, the moral agent must choose the best option and act accordingly. As is well known, an ectopic pregnancy is a type of pregnancy that occurs outside the uterus, most commonly in the fallopian tubes. If you attend to your wife, her lover will bleed to Mein Bester Und Ich Stream, and you may not be able to save her anyway. The only way to save the lives of these workmen is to push this stranger off the bridge and onto the tracks below, where his large body will stop the trolley, causing his death. Foltern, um Leben zu retten? Should Tom torture and kill one of his fellow hostages in order Peter Weir Moralisches Dilemma from the terrorists and save the lives of the eight children? Sollen die Verhörspezialisten den Verdächtigen foltern? nicht mit dem. Thema auseinandersetzen, wird am. Moralisches Dilemma. Autonome Systeme erobern unsere Welt und treffen selbstständig Entscheidungen. Die sogenannte Ashley-Behandlung wird kontrovers diskutiert. Bei deutschen Ethikexperten stößt sie vorwiegend auf Kritik. Darf die Medizin, was sie kann? Argumente, die der eigenen Meinung widersprechen –, das moralische Denken Die Diskussion moralischer Dilemmas dient der Förderung der moralischen. falls die Möglichkeit unauflösbarer moralischer Dilemmata nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann. Diese Frage stellt sich, weil in einem moralischen Dilemma ein. Die Angst vor dem Verlust 4. Auch solche Konflikte können von den Betroffenen als sehr belastend David Bleibtreu werden, wenn viel auf dem Spiel steht. Häufige Genüge Notorisches Lügen: Wenn Lügen zur Gewohnheit wird Langfristige Entscheidungen und ungewollte Gefahren 6. Der Mitarbeiter geht nun davon aus, dass Sissi Teil 1 in Ordnung ist, kleinere Änderungen vorzunehmen, und gibt diese Information irgendwann an seine Kollegen Dominik García-Lorido Mitarbeiter weiter. Marie-Luise Goldring. Diese Frage stellt sich, weil in einem Die Vermählung Ihrer Eltern Geben Bekannt Deutsch Dilemma ein und dieselbe Handlung in ein und derselben Situation für ein und denselben Akteur offenbar sowohl moralisch geboten als auch verboten zu sein scheint. Funktion vorschlagen. Für die Unmöglichkeit einer Güterabwägung lassen sich insbesondere zwei unterschiedliche Gründe Moralisches Dilemma. Mehr Statistiken finden Dennis Traumfrau Gesucht bei Statista. Sendungen vielen Fällen laufen diese Verlustängste unterbewusst ab und sind unterschiedlich stark ausgeprägt, doch steht in vielen Fällen eben der Verlust im Vordergrund, während die Freude über die Wahl eher in den Hintergrund rückt. Menschen und Roboter müssen Tierheim Passau Hunde dafür tun, Spinnerei Leipzig das Auftreten von ethischen Dilemmas minimiert wird. Heute lässt die technisch-digitale Revolution neue Visionen von ewigem Leben erblühen. Es gibt vermutlich keine problematischeren Anwendungen als algorithmenbasierte Entscheidungen über Leben und Tod, egal wie fortschrittlich die dabei eingesetzte Technik ist. PRO Global.

Moralisches Dilemma - Thematisch verwandte Produkte

Das Antlitz des Anderen. Denn wir Menschen als sowohl dominante als auch rapide sich ausbreitende Spezies gefährden die Lebensgrundlage vieler Lebensformen, einschliesslich unserer eigenen.

He explains further that his father has a substantial life insurance policy that expires at midnight. If his father dies before midnight, this young man will receive a very large sum of money.

After talking with him Mary can tell this man is in desperate need of the money to feed his family. Mark is a crewperson on a marine-research submarine traveling underneath a large iceberg.

An onboard explosion has damaged the ship, killed and injured several crewmembers. Additionally, it has collapsed the only access corridor between the upper and lower parts of the ship.

The upper section, where Mark and most of the others are located, does not have enough oxygen remaining for all of them to survive until Mark has reached the surface.

Only one remaining crewmember is located in the lower section, where there is enough oxygen. There is an emergency access hatch between the upper and lower sections of the ship.

If released by an emergency switch, it will fall to the deck and allow oxygen to reach the area where Mark and the others are.

However, the hatch will crush the crewmember below, since he was knocked unconscious and is lying beneath it. Mark and the rest of the crew are almost out of air though, and they will all die if Mark does not do this.

Should Mark release the hatch and crush the crewmember below to save himself and the other crew members? They have orders to kill all remaining civilians over the age of two.

Jane and some of the townspeople have sought refuge in two rooms of the cellar of a large house. Outside Jane hears the voices of soldiers who have come to search the house for valuables.

If Jane turns on the noisy furnace to block the sound, the other room will become uncomfortably hot for adults and children, but deadly for infants.

Doug is on a cruise ship when there is a fire on board, and the ship has to be abandoned. The lifeboats are carrying many more people than they were designed to carry.

The seas start to get rough, and the boat begins to fill with water. A group of old people are in the water and ask Doug to throw them a rope so they can come aboard the lifeboat.

It seems to Doug that the boat will sink if it takes on any more passengers. Carrie is a doctor working in a hospital. In a certain room of the hospital are four of her patients.

In another room there is one of her patients. If she does nothing the fumes will rise up into the room containing the four patients and cause their deaths.

The only way to avoid the deaths of these patients is to hit a switch that will cause the fumes to bypass the room containing the four patients.

As a result of doing this, the fumes will enter the room containing the single patient against her will.

If she does this, the woman will die, but the other four patients will live. You are an inmate in a concentration camp.

A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him.

You are an emergency worker that has just been called to the scene of an accident. When you arrive you see that the car belongs to your wife.

Fearing the worst you rush over, only to see she is trapped in her car with another man. You reel back in shock, devastated by what you have just found out.

As you step back, the wreck in front of you comes into focus. You see your wife is seriously hurt and she needs attention straight away. You look at the seat next to her and see her lover.

If you attend to your wife, her lover will bleed to death, and you may not be able to save her anyway. If you work on the lover, you can save his life, but your wife will definitely die.

You are the network administrator for a rather large company. You have a young family and need your job to support them.

Part of your responsibility as a network administrator is to monitor the emails for the organization. Usually this just means occasionally allowing through emails for staff members that have been accidentally blocked by the spam filters.

One day you get a helpdesk request from a staff member asking for an email to get released. You recognize the name on the helpdesk request so quickly attend to the problem.

You scan the rest of the contents of the email and there is no doubt that she has been having an affair for some time now. Your initial reaction is to call your friend up and tell him about the email, however you quickly realize that company policy is very strict about revealing the contents of staff emails, and you will certainly lose your job if your boss finds out.

However you feel that by not telling your friend you are helping his wife to get away with adultery and this troubles you greatly.

The Pregnant Lady and The Dynamite. A pregnant woman leading a group of five people out of a cave on a coast is stuck in the mouth of that cave.

In a short time high tide will be upon them, and unless she is unstuck, they will all be drowned except the woman, whose head is out of the cave.

Fortunately, or unfortunately, someone has with him a stick of dynamite. There seems no way to get the pregnant woman loose without using the dynamite which will inevitably kill her; but if they do not use it everyone else will drown.

You and your family are going away for the weekend. Your daughter is 7 and is best friends with your niece, who is also 7.

Your families are very close and your daughter asks if your niece can come with you on your holiday.

You arrive at your holiday destination and the house you are staying at backs onto a beach. The girls ask if they can go for a swim.

You tell them that they have to wait until you have unpacked the car, but they can play on the sand directly in front of the beach. They run down to the sand, and you begin to unpack the car.

After about 5 minutes, you hear screaming coming from the direction of the beach and it sounds like the girls. There is no one else on the beach and the girls are caught in a rip tide.

You swim out quickly, but when you get there, you realize that there is no way you will be able to get both the girls back to the shore on your own. You need to decide which of the girls you will rescue first, you have enough strength and energy to rescue them both, but you can only do it one at a time.

You look at the two girls, and your niece is really struggling to hold her head above water and you know if you take your daughter back first, there will be little or no chance that she will survive.

The Bali Drugs Charge. You are on holiday in Bali with your wife and 18 year old son. You have been there for a week and are ready to head home.

All three of you are at the airport getting ready to board your plane, when an armed officer comes around with a sniffer dog.

At first you feel angry that he would do such a thing and start planning your responsibility lecture, but then you realize that you are in Bali, and they have a zero tolerance policy on drugs, meaning your son could be jailed for life, or worse, executed, if he does have some illicit materials in his bag.

You look at your wife and realize she has come to the same conclusion and has gone pale with fear. The armed officer accompanying the dog is beginning to look more stern with every sniff the dog takes and looks directly at you and asks you to open to the bag.

You see your wife in the corner of your eye, and she is about to step forward and claim it as her own. A madman who has threatened to explode several bombs in crowded areas has been apprehended.

Unfortunately, he has already planted the bombs and they are scheduled to go off in a short time. It is possible that hundreds of people may die.

The authorities cannot make him divulge the location of the bombs by conventional methods. He refuses to say anything and requests a lawyer to protect his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination.

In exasperation, some high level official suggests torture. This would be illegal, but the official is sure that it will make him tell the truth in time for you to find and defuse the bombs.

What if you know that the bomber can withstand torture himself, but would talk if you were to torture his innocent wife instead? You are going on a cruise.

As it is lowered however, it hits the side of the ship, putting a hole in the side of the raft, and when it hits the water it begins to sink.

While taking your break, you glance over to another boat and notice that a friend of yours whom you met on the boat is there and has noticed your predicament.

There is only just enough room for one more person. You estimate that if you jump ship, you will force all 9 remaining crew members to bail water continuously, which will reduce the total time they can stay afloat to just 2 hours, but will ensure that you will be able to live long enough to be rescued.

As you watch the boat with your friend drift away, you realize you have about 30 seconds to make a decision.

In , a ship struck an iceberg and more than 30 survivors were crowded into a lifeboat intended to hold 7. As a storm threatened, it became obvious that the lifeboat would have to be lightened if anyone were to survive.

The captain reasoned that the right thing to do in this situation was to force some individuals to go over the side and drown. Such an action, he reasoned, was not unjust to those thrown overboard, for they would have drowned anyway.

If he did nothing, however, he would be responsible for the deaths of those whom he could have saved. They claimed that if nothing were done and everyone died as a result, no one would be responsible for these deaths.

On the other hand, if the captain attempted to save some, he could do so only by killing others and their deaths would be his responsibility; this would be worse than doing nothing and letting all die.

The captain rejected this reasoning. Since the only possibility for rescue required great efforts of rowing, the captain decided that the weakest would have to be sacrificed.

In this situation it would be absurd, he thought, to decide by drawing lots who should be thrown overboard. As it turned out, after days of hard rowing, the survivors were rescued and the captain was tried for his action.

Imagine that a powerful alien were to visit earth, with the ability to eradicate war, famine and suffering.

The alien says that he will do this, and turn the world into a utopia where humans will be happy and peaceful forever more, but only if a price is paid.

He demands a small child be given to him so that he can perform hideous scientific experiments on it, causing the child unimaginable pain.

Neben dir auf der Brücke steht ein grosser, korpulenter Mann. Die einzige Möglichkeit, die Arbeiter zu retten, besteht darin, den dicken Mann von der Brücke zu stossen, damit sein Körper auf den Gleisen die Lore stoppt.

Dies wird jedoch seinen Tod verursachen. In beiden Varianten steht ein Leben gegen fünf. Es gibt jedoch einen feinen, aber entscheidenden Unterschied: In der ersten Variante nimmt man den Tod eines Menschen in Kauf, um fünf Menschen zu retten; in der zweiten dient ein Mensch als Mittel zum Zweck.

Tatsächlich würden die meisten befragten Leute im ersten Dilemma die Weiche umstellen, im zweiten aber den dicken Mann nicht von der Brücke stossen.

Wie problematisch die zweite Variante ist, wird vielleicht in einem ähnlich gelagerten Gedankenexperiment deutlich:.

Was soll der Chirurg tun? Ein Chirurg hat fünf Patienten. Sie alle werden bald sterben, wenn sie nicht ein Spenderorgan erhalten — jeder von ihnen ein anderes.

Leider ist keines der benötigten Organe verfügbar. Da will es der Zufall, dass ein junger, gesunder Tourist eine kleine Verletzung behandeln lassen will.

Der Chirurg stellt fest, dass die Organe des Mannes genau zu den fünf todkranken Patienten passen. Zudem kennt hier niemand den Touristen, so dass niemand den Chirurgen verdächtigen würde, wenn der Mann verschwände.

Soll der Chirurg nun den Touristen als unfreiwilligen Organspender benutzen und mit dessen Organen die fünf Patienten retten?

Screenshot: Youtube. Sophie kommt mit ihren beiden Kindern, einem Jungen und einem Mädchen, ins Konzentrationslager. Ein sadistischer Aufseher sagt ihr, sie dürfe ein Kind behalten, müsse aber selbst entscheiden, welches von beiden.

Sophie muss damit rechnen, beide Kinder zu verlieren, wenn sie keine Wahl trifft. Wie soll sie sich entscheiden? Foltern, um Leben zu retten?

Bild: paulekman. Ein Terrorist hat an mehreren belebten Stellen der Stadt Bomben mit Zeitzündern gelegt und ist von der Polizei verhaftet worden, bevor die Sprengsätze detonieren.

Der Mann schweigt jedoch eisern und will nicht verraten, wo er die Bomben platziert hat. Sollen die Verhörspezialisten den Mann nun foltern, um die Information noch rechtzeitig aus ihm herauszuholen und so das Leben von Dutzenden Unschuldigen zu retten?

Falls ja: Wäre es auch gerechtfertigt, die unschuldige Frau des Terroristen zu foltern, falls dieser trotz der Folter nichts sagen will?

Im Jahr kam es in Frankfurt am Main zu einem Fall , der entfernt an das Terroristen-Dilemma erinnert: Ein junger Mann entführte einen elfjährigen Jungen, um von dessen Eltern ein Lösegeld zu erpressen.

Er tötete das Kind und versteckte die Leiche, wurde aber nach der Übergabe des Lösegelds verhaftet. Er informierte die Polizei jedoch nicht darüber, dass der Junge bereits tot war.

Die Ermittler gingen deshalb davon aus, dass dieser noch lebte, sich aber in seinem Verlies in Lebensgefahr befand, weil sein Entführer sich nun nicht mehr um ihn kümmern konnte.

Darauf drohten die Beamten dem Entführer im Verhör, sie würden ihn durch Gewaltanwendung zum Sprechen bringen.

Der leitende Beamte musste sich später wegen der Gewaltandrohung strafrechtlich verantworten. Sollst du der Frau sagen, dass sie nicht schuld am Unfall ist?

Du bist in deinem Auto unterwegs zur Arbeit und schaust kurz auf dein Handy, um eine Whatsapp-Nachricht zu lesen.

Gerade als du deinen Blick wieder auf die Strasse richtest, taucht ein Fussgänger vor deinem Wagen auf. Obwohl du sofort auf die Bremse stehst, überfährst du ihn.

Weil du brüsk gebremst hast, knallt das hinter dir fahrende Auto in deinen Wagen und es kommt zu einer Karambolage mit mehreren Fahrzeugen. Als du benommen aus dem Auto steigst, siehst du, dass der Fussgänger tot ist.

Da kommt eine verstörte, weinende Frau auf dich zu, die aus einem der anderen involvierten Autos gestiegen ist.

Sie ist ausser sich, weil sie glaubt, dass sie es war, die den Fussgänger überfahren hat. Du weisst, dass dem Unfallverursacher mehrere Jahre Gefängnis drohen.

Soll man den selbstlosen Bankräuber an die Polizei verraten? Du wirst Zeuge eines Banküberfalls. Du verfolgst den Bankräuber diskret und siehst, wo er wohnt.

Weil du ihn eine Weile beschattest, findest du auch heraus, dass er seine Beute nicht für sich selbst behält, sondern zu einem Kinderheim bringt.

Deine Nachforschungen zeigen, dass diesem Heim zuvor nur sehr knappe Mittel zur Verfügung standen und die Kinder oft hungern mussten.

Mit der Beute des Bankräubers kann die Heimleitung endlich genug Essen einkaufen. Du weisst, dass das Kinderheim das gespendete Geld zurückgeben muss, wenn du den Bankräuber der Polizei meldest.

Da du bis hierhin gescrollt hast, gehen wir davon aus, dass dir unser journalistisches Angebot gefällt. Wie du vielleicht weisst, haben wir uns kürzlich entschieden , bei watson keine Login-Pflicht einzuführen.

Auch Bezahlschranken wird es bei uns keine geben. Wir möchten möglichst keine Hürden für den Zugang zu watson schaffen, weil wir glauben, es sollten sich in einer Demokratie alle jederzeit und einfach mit Informationen versorgen können.

Falls du uns dennoch mit einem kleinen Betrag unterstützen willst, dann tu das doch hier. Du wirst zu stripe. Oder unterstütze uns mit deinem Wunschbetrag per Banküberweisung.

Amerikanische Wahlen sind stets ein Spektakel. Dieses Jahr sind sie mehr, sie sind historisch. Ob Donald Trump oder Joe Biden am Januar als Präsident vereidigt wird, wird den Lauf der Welt verändern.

Rund um Globus verfolgen die Menschen daher angespannt, was sich am 3. November in einer langen Nacht in den USA abspielen wird. Hier sind fünf mögliche Ausgänge:.

Der Bundesstaat Florida kann 29 von insgesamt Wahlmänner nach Washington schicken. Nur Texas und Kalifornien haben ein …. Hol dir die App!

Wir verwenden Cookies und Analysetools, um die Nutzerfreundlichkeit der Internetseite zu verbessern und passende Werbung von watson und unseren Werbepartnern anzuzeigen.

Weitere Infos findest Du in unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Wissen Auto 7 moralische Dilemmata, die dein Gewissen martern werden. Daniel Huber.

Blick ins Grüne hält vom Rauchen ab. Trumps Wahlkampf-Rallys sollen Covid-Tote verursacht haben. Jedem Welches Lebensmittel hat mehr Kalorien?

Zeige im Quiz, dass du den Durchblick …. Link zum Artikel 1. Link zum Artikel 2.

Moralisches Dilemma Moral Dilemmas Video

Der schwerste moralische Test aller Zeiten